Iron man 3 review: EXPLOSIONS!
Intro
This movie takes off right after
the events in the Avengers ended, so watching that movie is much recommended
before watching this one. This means that the protagonist, Tony Stark (Who
invented and wears the Iron Man armor) is confused by the mysteries left behind
by the last movie and doesn’t know how to go forward. This makes him very
stressed out, and he begins having anxiety attacks when he is reminded of those
events. A large part of the challenge he faces is inside him, and it really
makes the movie more engrossing.
I can’t even tell you about the
enemies he fights without spoiling the movie, and this leads to my next note,
plot twists. Though a few were predictable, this movie really changes around,
and it is really surprising how the movie unfolds.
This movie more than almost any
I’ve seen focuses on action. There is so much action in the movie it’s a good
thing and a bad thing. This is my one real complaint with the movie, it’s
possible to have too much action.
Some viewers may be disappointed to see so much of the movie dedicated to
explosions. Most, however, will completely love every minute of it. This movie
is a thrilling roller coaster ride from beginning to end, and it demands to be
watched.
The verdict here is just this:
Watch it. Some might think it layers the action on a bit too thick, but there
is great chance anyone who watches will enjoy it a lot. So grab a bowl of
popcorn and sit down for the ride.
SimCity Review: a flawed, but unique experience.
SimCity may be more famous for its launch than for the game
itself, or really, infamous. SimCity is a game for PC that launched with severe
server issues, magnified by the fact that the single player mode requires a
connection to a server. That said, while the game is getting bad press, it isn’t
a bad game.
SimCity is a city management simulator, which sounds boring.
However, those that have played a game like this before can attest to the
remarkable sense of reward given by succeeding at this genre. The game starts
in a region, with multiple cities inside them. Click on an empty city, and you
can claim it. You are now mayor, and this is where the management takes
place. You have many things to manage,
and different buildings to create in your city. The main goal is to create a
successful city without going bankrupt.
Compared to other games in the series, this game makes changes
to the formula. Now the electrical wiring and plumbing are contained in roads,
no longer needing the player to put them on separately. Resource trading is
added, and the user interface is great.
However with these changes come negatives. To not overload
servers, the map size is small. In a frustrating move, you can’t upgrade
streets to avenues, regardless of density. This leaves huge traffic problems
later on. Also, the game is very flawed with its AI (artificial intelligence). Drivers
go on smaller roads, seemingly at random, even though there are better
alternatives. Also, when I was trading power from one city to another, it
didn’t pick up I was getting power, and kept warning me that I had no power.
There are a lot of issues in region play. Trading power doesn’t work as every
town basically has to have a power plant at later stages, even if another town
has excess power to sell.
However, after all the issues it is not bad. though it‘s a
bit harder to recommend. The creators have said they are fixing parts of the
game, and perhaps after that I can recommend it, but until then, wait. The game can be great at times, but it’s
really the constant flaws that hold it down. Playing is a chore sometimes, but
honestly, it’s hard stopping. I give it a 3.5/5.
“The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey”-into
Mediocrity Review
By Daniel Hampton
At the very beginning of the film, Frodo appears for a brief
appearance to tie in the old films and to show that Bilbo had just finished
writing The Hobbit. While this scene
doesn’t really mean much, it works as an omen for the rest of the film.
-Peter Jackson didn’t make a The Hobbit movie; he’s made a prequel to The Lord of the Rings trilogy. While this may seem like the same
thing, one has to realize that The Hobbit
was originally a stand-alone work.
The Hobbit is a
slim children’s book, one that doesn’t take a whole long time to read and is
rather easy to understand. Contrast this with The Lord of the Rings, which is a long and deep story. The Hobbit is one book, and the lord of
the rings is three, and when transferred to movies, it made sense to have them
be trilogy. The Hobbit is also being transferred into trilogy, one that adds
very much content and makes it much more similar to the lord of the rings, much
to the malign of those that liked the original.
The Hobbit: An
Unexpected Journey is not based on the book. It is even easy to say if not
for the setting being the same as the hobbit book; it could easily be a “lost”
lord of the rings book. The movie, the first of the trilogy is a bit less than
three hours long; since the book is small they added a lot to fill the movie.
A pale orc is added for an antagonist, one of the dwarves is
given a heroic and tragic back-story. Entire scenes, including the climax of
the movie are not anywhere in the book. I don’t want to give away spoilers, but
be prepared for a strange wizard with literal bird droppings all over his face.
You have been warned.
The gist of the story in the movie is that Bilbo Baggins is
visited by a wizard named Gandalf and 12 dwarves. Why 12? No one knows, apparently
and now they need another member because it’s bad to adventure with only 13
people. Why they couldn’t kick out one of the dwarves is very odd, but it was
probably just a ploy to make Bilbo go. I mean really, they couldn’t recruit anyone else but some random hobbit?
Anyway Bilbo is guilt-tripped into joining and now they are set to go and take
back the dwarves home.
As far as presentation goes, the film is pretty good. The
announcement that they were making the movie at 40 frames-per-second made some
doubt its quality, but it looks fine. This movie, unlike the lord of the rings,
uses cgi (computer generated images) for the monsters and enemies, and it’s
pretty obvious. The enemies are not frightening and look pretty fake, aside
from Gollum, which actually has his best scene in the movie, which is also
probably the movie’s best scene as well. Actually the film’s choice of cgi may
have been due to its violence, the movie’s action scenes come off rather
grotesque. The music, however, is great as ever and really helps pull the movie
along at times.
As far as plot is concerned, it’s very slow. Not a whole lot
happens in the few pages of the book this covers, and what your left with is a
very lacking movie overall. That being said, the movie sets the precedent
rather well, so there is potential for the sequels to be some deal better.
In conclusion, the Hobbit: An unexpected Journey is hardly a
journey at all, more a drawn out introduction. The movie has serious problems
in the plot and presentation, and nothing really makes up for it. That being
said, it’s worth a watch for any Lord of the Rings fan, at the least for the
setting it sets for the future.
Sadly, the pale orc and the wizard are mentioned in other works by Tolkien.
ReplyDeleteWasn't there 13 dwarves? I lost count... Nice review.
ReplyDeleteThanks, I believe there were twelve, with Gandalf bringing the number to 13.
DeleteThanks, I believe there were twelve, with Gandalf bringing the number to 13.
Delete